Labor and Employment Law
Labor and Employment Law: severance, overtime, and employment status
Severance that was not paid on time, overtime missing from the payslip, hazard pay that was never paid, a contractor arrangement with an employee’s routine. The review compares what was signed with what the daily routine shows. Employers are also assisted, before any dispute arises.
The chat opens with a ready-made message, which you can edit before sending.
- First contact via WhatsApp
- In person in Belém/PA or by video call
- Professional confidentiality from the first conversation
Do any of these situations sound familiar?
- You were dismissed and your severance was not paid on time, or was paid in a smaller amount.
- You work overtime or through your break, and it does not show on your payslip.
- You are exposed to harmful agents or to risk at work and do not receive the corresponding additional pay.
- You were hired as a contractor (PJ) or freelancer, but you keep fixed hours and take orders.
- Salary payments or FGTS (severance fund) deposits are frequently late.
- You are an employer and want to review contracts, working hours, and time records before they become a liability.
If any of them resembles what you are going through, tell us what happened. The team will point out where to start.
Message us on WhatsAppThe daily work routine matters more than the contract label.
A labor dispute rarely stems from a single incident: it builds up over the course of the contract — in overtime left out of the calculation, in an allowance that stops being paid, in a shift schedule that eats into the rest break. Often it only surfaces when the employment ends without proper settlement. In sectors such as mining, port operations, private security, and healthcare, 12x36 shift schedules (12 hours on, 36 hours off), exposure to harmful agents, and hiring workers as legal entities (PJ) make these issues recurrent, and what can be disputed depends on the facts, the records, and the applicable collective agreement.
At MSC Advocacia, the work begins by comparing what the contract provided with what the daily routine shows. To that end, pay stubs, time records, the termination statement, the FGTS (Brazil’s severance fund) statement, and the collective instruments for the worker’s category are gathered. It is this material that supports — or does not support — what one intends to dispute, in court or through the administrative route. Employers also consult the firm before litigation arises, to review contracts and routines.
Areas of work
Issues that arise from the employment relationship.
Each area below indicates which records are checked and what they need to prove. Pay stubs, time records, the termination statement, and the collective agreement usually define what there is to dispute.
Severance pay and FGTS
The termination statement is checked against what was owed: outstanding salary, notice period, proportional vacation pay and 13th-month salary, and FGTS (Brazil’s severance fund) deposits and release. When payment is late or amounts differ, the penalties under articles 467 and 477 of the CLT (Brazil’s Consolidation of Labor Laws) are examined.
Hazardous-conditions pay for unhealthy or dangerous work
The allowance is determined by the duties actually performed, not by the job description. The assessment covers exposure to chemical, physical, biological, or flammable agents, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and the expert evidence needed to dispute the allowance and its effects on other pay items.
Working hours, overtime, and breaks
Time records, 12x36 schedules, hour banks, and denied meal and rest breaks during the workday, read together with what the collective agreement provides. The review extends to the calculation of overtime and the night-shift premium.
Constructive dismissal of the employment contract
When the serious misconduct is the employer’s — repeated late payment of wages, failure to make required deposits, excessive harshness — the contract may be terminated on the grounds of the employer’s fault. The facts, the available evidence, and the steps that may precede a court claim are examined.
Employment status and disguised contractor (PJ) arrangements
Contracts signed as a legal entity (PJ), through a cooperative, or as independent services, compared with the actual routine. Personal performance, payment, non-occasional work, and subordination are the elements that determine whether an employment relationship exists.
Preventive guidance for employers
Review of contracts, working-hour policies, time tracking, and job classification, identifying the points that create liability risk and the routines that can be adjusted before any litigation.
What happens after you send your message.
You tell us what happened
On WhatsApp, a short summary is enough: what happened and since when. There is no need to send documents at this first stage.
The team guides the review
The firm tells you which documents to gather and schedules the review meeting, in person in Belém/PA or by video call.
You learn the possible paths
With the documents in hand, the firm explains the available alternatives, their risks, and the steps involved in each one. The decision to move forward is yours.
What helps to have at hand
- Work card (carteira de trabalho) and employment contract
- Payslips
- Termination statement and FGTS statement
- Time records or work schedules
- Messages, emails, and the collective bargaining agreement, if you have them
Missing something? Send the message anyway: the list is adjusted to your case.
Message us on WhatsApp
Who assists you
MSC Advocacia — Melo Souza Cunha Advocacia e Consultoria — was founded by attorney Tainá Cunha (OAB/PA nº 36.711) and is based in Belém/PA, Brazil. Nationwide practice, with in-person and video call appointments.
Ed. EvolutionUmarizal, Belém/PA
About the firmFrequently asked questions about Labor and Employment Law.
First, the date the dismissal was communicated and the payment deadline set by article 477 of the CLT (Brazil’s Consolidation of Labor Laws). Then, the content of the termination statement compared with the amounts actually paid. If the documents show a delay or discrepancies, there is room to dispute the outstanding amounts and the penalties under articles 467 and 477.
The review starts with the collective instrument that authorizes the schedule, moves on to the time records, and reaches the meal and rest break actually taken. Partial or total denial of the break has its own effect on pay for that period, and what can be argued depends on what the time-tracking records show.
Based on the actual routine, not on the label of the signed contract. The factors observed include working hours and how they are controlled, subordination to supervisors, exclusivity, the structure of the hiring company, and the form of payment. When these elements point to an employment relationship, the firm provides guidance on the available routes and on the evidence that supports the claim.
Looking for guidance on a labor matter?
The clearer the period worked, the duties performed, and how the contract ended, the more objective the guidance becomes.